A cartoon portraying the [[British Empire as an octopus, reaching into foreign lands]]
Imperialism is a policy of extending the control or authority over foreign entities as a means of acquisition and/or maintenance of
empires, either through direct
territorial or through indirect methods of exerting control on the
politics and/or
economy of other countries.
The term is used by some to describe the policy of a country in maintaining
colonies and dominance over distant lands, regardless of whether the country calls itself an empire.
Insofar as
imperialism might be used to refer to an intellectual position, it would imply the belief that the acquisition and maintenance of empires is a positive good, probably combined with an assumption of cultural or other such superiority inherent to imperial power. See
The White Man's Burden.
In recent years, there has been a trend to criticise imperialism not at an economic or political level, but at a simply cultural level, particularly the widespread global influence of American culture - see
cultural imperialism. Some dispute this extension, however, on the grounds that it is highly subjective (to differentiate between mutual interaction and undue influence) and also applied selectively (Coca Cola being imperialist and black tea not). The debate continues.
Etymology
The term
imperialism was a new word in the mid-
19th century.
According to the
OED, it dates back to 1858, to describe
Pax Britannica. However its intellectual roots can certainly be traced as far back as
Dante, who in his
Monarchia depicted a world with a single political focus and governed by
rationalism. Dante was very influential on
John Dee, who coined the term
British Empire in the late
16th century. Dee was instrumental in creating the intellectual and scientific environment whereby
English seafarers such as
Humphrey Gilbert,
Martin Frobisher and
Walter Raleigh could set the groundwork for a maritime empire.
According to the OED, in
19th century England,
imperialism, was generally used only to describe English policies. However, soon after the invention of the term,
imperÍalism was used in retrospect about the policies of the
Roman Empire.
In the
20th century, the term has been used to describe the policies of both the
Soviet Union and the
United States, although these differed greatly from each other and from 19th-century imperialism. Furthermore, the term has been expanded to apply, in general, to any historical instance of the aggrandizement of a greater power at the expense of a lesser power.
Since the end of
World War II and particularly following the collapse of the Soviet Union and its
satellite states, accusations of imperialism have almost exclusively been levelled at the sole-remaining
superpower, the United States.
Marxist theory of Imperialism
Marxists use the term
imperialism as Lenin defined it: "the highest stage of capitalism", specifically the era in which monopoly finance capital becomes dominant, forcing the empires to compete amongst themselves increasingly for control over resources and markets all over the world. This control may take the form of geopolitical machinations, military adventures, or financial maneuvers.
The essential feature of the Marxist theories of imperialism, or related theories such as
dependency theory, is their exclusive focus on the economic relation between countries, rather than the explicit political relationship. Imperialism thus consists not in the direct control of one country by another, but in the economic
exploitation of one region by another, or by a group from another. This Marxist usage contrasts with many people's understanding of the connotation of the word
imperialism, which they think of as relating to the era when countries directly controlled vast empires, rather than the economic domination that some parts of the world have over others today - this is a conflation of imperialism with
colonialism, the establishment of overseas colonies.
Although Marxists generally consider imperialist powers to be the
capitalist countries of the
First World, some Marxists (primarily Maoists) and others believe that the
Soviet Union eventually became
social-imperialist—socialist in words but imperialist in deeds— using its power and influence to dominate the East Bloc and various other countries.
China,
India, and other large countries with regional influence are sometimes charged with imperialism as well.
It is worth noting that
Marx himself did not propound a theory of imperialism, and in contrast with later Marxist thinkers generally saw the
colonialism of European powers as being essentially about extending capitalism worldwide, rather than seeing it as the pillage of those countries in favour of the European centre countries.
Modern imperialism
There is a contemporary debate surrounding the
United States and whether or not the power it exerts upon much of the world and its policy amounts to imperialism —hence sometimes the U.S. is referred to as the "
American Empire."
With the collapse of the
Soviet Union and the end of the
Cold War, the
United States is now the dominant power in the world. That argument seems difficult to refute, as the U.S. has many times over the past century used both military intervention and economic or political influence to shape the countries within its domain in the
Western Hemisphere. Though opinions vary greatly between
hawkish and
dovish political powers in the U.S., the more hawkish may regard imperialist-style
expansionism as simply part of the the nations "responsibility," "
interest" or "
Manifest Destiny."
The term is naturally controversial —the term "empire" is largely limited to descriptions of history (rather than contemporary events) and likewise the historical examples of empire tend to be more familiar and evokative of the concept. As such, modern examples of coersion and
militarism may be viewed differently.
The United States has also only had very few years of status as "sole
superpower," without the
Soviet Union to be its dominant political, military, and ideological foe. The
Cold War battle for
geopolitical supremacy tends to be cast in terms of
freedom versus repression, thereby diminishing the imperial aspects of both powers. Further, as "imperialism" tends to have negative connotations of tyranny and
repression, such a claimed empires "subjects" may be naturally disinclined to use it in any reference to themselves.
In the early 21st Century, the U.S. has turned its military, political, and economic ambitions towards oil-rich countries in
Central Asia and the
Middle East.
Beginning with the end of
World War II, the U.S. largely took over from the UK certain roles by which it controlled the
Middle East. Through
United States-instigated and assisted assasinations and coups, several Middle Eastern nations have felt the strong influence of Western societies:
Egypt,
Iraq,
Saudi Arabia,
Syria,
Lebanon, and
Israel have been directly or otherwise substantially influenced by U.S. policy.
(This does not include prior or continuing
British Empire holdings of the time —notably in
India and
Pakistan.)
As there are few other countries with such a capability, it has been said that U.S. military actions are partly or mostly acts of militarist imperialism —in spite of humanitarian rhetoric, their cause is the expansion of U.S. power.
Two uncontroversial facts are that the U.S. currently has a much larger and more sophisticated military than any other country —operating over 100 bases in every part of the world. The U.S. has also used its military to control its "interests." It is debatable wether these two things alone constitute imperialism, or whether such "imperialism" adequately resembles past incarnations —Roman, British, German or otherwise.
See also
References
- Marxist Theories of Imperialism, Anthony Brewer.
External links
ca:Imperialisme
de:Imperialismus
es:Imperialismo
fr:Impérialisme
he:אימפריאליזם
ja:帝国主義
pl:Imperializm
pt:Imperialismo
sl:Imperializem
fi:Imperialismi
zh:帝国主义
nl:Imperialisme